Case ID: 38716
Age: 47Height: Weight: Procedure: LiposuctionDescription: Before and 7 months after treatment of gynecomastia with aggressive liposuction. Approximately 200 cc fatty tissue was removed on each side. Although not all of the glandular tissue can be removed with liposuction in this case this was a very nice improvement.
Patient # 38716Case ID: 35544
Age: 29Height: 5'7"Weight: 120Procedure: Description: before and 4 weeks after subglandular breast augmentation. The implants are 310 cc classic base moderate projection Sientra tear drop shaped (gummy bear) silicone implants placed in the subglandular position.
Patient # 35544Case ID: 63565
Age: 20Height: 5'7"Weight: 120Procedure: 'Gummy Bear' silicone implants subglandular breast augmentationDescription: Before and 3 weeks after subglandular breast augmentation. She was concerned with dynamic implant motion with exercise and wanted a natural shape. We chose 400 cc classic base moderate projection Sientra tear drop shaped (gummy bear) silicone
Patient # 63565Case ID: 65292
Age: 35 Height: 156 Weight: 132 Procedure: Mommy makeover consisting of breast augmentation & abdominoplasty. Description: Mother of three desired mommy makeover consisting of breast augmentation and abdominoplasty. Her breasts had significant droop and a tear drop shaped implant above the muscle was chosen to help maximally lift and support the breasts without a
Patient # 65292Case ID: 99747
Age: 32Height: 5'4"Weight: 133Procedure: Description: before and 3 months after breast augmentation with Sientra tear drop shaped implants. The implants chosen were 350 cc classic base moderate projection placed beneath the muscle. She reports she went from a B cup to a C cup
Patient # 99747Case ID: 30857
Age: 26Height: 5'6"Weight: 125Procedure: Description: before and 3 month after breast augmentation with Mentor smooth round moderate plus profile silicone implants, 300 cc right and 325 cc left. The inframammary fold was lowered 5 mm on the left for improved implant positioning and symmetry. She reports she
Patient # 30857Case ID: 75137
Age: 26Height: 5'0"Weight: 140Procedure: Description: This patient presented with a very tight, constricted lower pole to the breast. She was at risk of a “double bubble” deformity with significant lowering of the breast crease but at risk of a very high riding implant otherwise with a standard round implant.
Patient # 75137Case ID: 84430
Age: 34 Height: 5’6″ Weight: 176 Procedure: Description: The patient lost 185 lbs after her last pregnancy. She breast lift and augmentation with an anchor scar pattern 400 cc saline implants. She also had extended abdominoplasty as a separate procedure. She is shown at 1 year post operatively.
Patient # 84430Case ID: 25359
Age: 32 Height: 5’6″ Weight: 148 lbs Procedure: breast augmentation and tummy tuck Description: This patient presented for breast augmentation and a tummy tuck. She had a lower abdominal scar previously from pelvic surgery. For the breast augmentation we used submuscular smooth round moderate plus profile 350 cc silicone implants. She reports she went
Patient # 25359Case ID: 58511
Age: 31Height: 5'2"Weight: 131 lbsProcedure: breast augmentationDescription: The patient is 3 months after breast augmentation. We used submuscular 400 cc smooth round silicone implants. She reports she went from a B to a D cup.
Patient # 58511
